The Problem
Clinical workflow software is famously broken. Nurses at most US hospitals spend 35-45% of their shift on documentation in an EHR — Epic, Cerner, Meditech — that was designed primarily for billing, not for clinical work. Every health-system CIO knows this. Every nurse knows this. And yet the dominant EHRs sit at the center of contracts so large and integrations so deep that ripping them out is unthinkable.
The opportunity, if there was one, lay in the layer above the EHR. A workflow product that lived between the nurse and the EHR, automated the documentation drudge, and gave the nurse back fifteen minutes a shift. Multiply that across a 600-bed hospital and you save roughly $4-6M a year in nursing labor.
I'd been a clinical informaticist for seven years. I'd watched startups try to build this layer and fail. Most failed because they were built by software people who'd never held a patient's hand at 3am. The product would pass demo with a CIO and die on contact with the actual unit.
Loomwork's bet was that a clinically-led founding team — myself, a hospital pharmacist named David, and an EHR-integration engineer named Ren — could ship the layer that previous startups had missed. I'd read a piece on representation learning over EHR data the same week we incorporated, which mostly confirmed our suspicion: the data was rich enough; the workflow layer was the problem.

Responses
Join the conversation
You need to log in to read or write responses.
No responses yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!